See this article:
According to this article, a recent skull find may “rewrite” human evolution. I’ve long been told since evolutionary science is so solid it will never be rewritten, but perhaps added to what exists. For the last few years I have been researching this, that sentiment does not seem to be the case. I have found article upon article that throws wrenches in what we think is our current understanding.
This latest find states that perhaps there are not as many intermediate forms in the lineage of humans stating: “just as people look different from one another today, so did early hominids look different from one another, and the dissimilarity of the bones they left behind may have fooled scientists into thinking that they came from different species.” Isn’t this what creationist organizations have been saying for years??
According to creationists, different skeletal remains of distinct humans may represent pre-flood or immediate post-flood humans that have adapted to those different atmospheric conditions – but not intermediate forms. Glad to see mainstream science catching up with creation little by little, just like they’ve done with junk DNA and the “tree of life” reinterpretations as of late.
I realize this more than likely won’t change their worldview, but it is a further confirmation that shaky science inevitably will evolve itself while firm foundations never change.